University of Taipei:Item 987654321/6807
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 1922/17135 (11%)
造访人次 : 4499327      在线人数 : 1538
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://utaipeir.lib.utaipei.edu.tw/dspace/handle/987654321/6807


    题名: The Effects of Reading Stories Aloud with Instruction on Vocabulary Learning
    作者: Huang, Yen-tzu
    Cheng, Chin-kuei
    贡献者: Taipei Municipal University of Education
    Taipei Municipal University of Education
    关键词: Reading stories aloud
    Word instruction
    Vocabulary learning
    日期: 2009-06
    上传时间: 2012-11-30 20:53:22 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 臺北市立教育大學人文藝術學院英語教學系
    摘要: This studt investigated the effects of reading aloud repeatedly with word instruction in L1 or L2onEFL children's vocablary learning. Four classes of fifth-grade children (in total 100 children) participated in the study. Two classes listened to four English stories with word instruction in chinese (L1 word Instruction Group ),and the other same four stories with word instruction in english (L2 word Instruction Group ). Based on their scores on the English final examination in the previous semester, the participants in each group were further divided into the higher proficiency and the lower proficiency subgroups. One week before the treatments, a receptive vocabulary pretest was administered. Then there were four learning sessions within the following four weeks, one session per week. In each session, each group listened to one story read aloud three times and received word instruction in L1 or L2 twice. At the end of each session, the participants took a productive vocabulary posttest and then a receptive vocabulary posttest. The results showed that L1 Word Instruction Group performed significantly better on the receptive vocabulary posttest than L2 Word Instruction Group. On the other hand, L2 Word lnstruction Group singificantly outperformed L1 Word Instruction Group on the productive vocabulary posttest. Moreover, whether L1 or L2 was used for word instruction, higher proficiency children performed better than lower proficiency children in both receptive and productive vocabulary learning. Finally, there was a significant interaction effect between students' proficiency levels and the languages used for the word instruction in productive vocabulary learning. That is, though L2 word instruction was more effective than L1 word instruction in helping all the participants increase productive vocabulary, the higher proficiency children benefited more from L2 word instruction in productive learning than the lower proficiency children. The findings of the study suggest that word instruction in L1 is more effect than word instruction in L2 in facilitating receptive vocabulary learning, while word instruction in L2 seems to make greater contribution to EFL children's productive vocabulary learning than word instruction in L1.Furthermore, higher proficiency children seem to benefit more from L2 word instruction than lower proficiency children in productive vocabulary learning.
    關聯: 北市大語文學報
    外國語文領域
    2期
    頁1-23
    显示于类别:[人文藝術學院] 北市大語文學報

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    2-1.pdf880KbAdobe PDF611检视/开启


    在uTaipei中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    如有問題歡迎與系統管理員聯繫
    02-23113040轉2132
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈